|
Construction Managment III- Course Assessment |
||||
|
Rubrics to Meet Course Objectives (Cumulative Blocks) |
||||
| Performance |
F-D |
C |
B |
A |
| Course Elements | Unsatisfactory Performance | Acceptable Performance | Good Performance | Targeted Performance |
| Class Participation 15% | - Student Missed four or more classes/Team meetings or Combination | -Student missed less than four Classes/Team Meetings or Combination | - Student missed less than three Classes/Team Meetings or Combination | - Student missed less than two Class/Team Meetings or Combination |
| - Student Failed to engage in sharing ideas with their team | - Student Demonstrated Participation in Case Study Report (Executive Summary) | - Student Demonstrated Participation in Case Study Presentation | - Student Demonstrated Effective Team Work as evidenced in BB | |
| - Student received negative feedback from all other team members | - Student Participated in Class Exercises and in Quizzes | - Student Students Participated in Class Discussion | - Student received positive feedback from all other team members | |
| Student Completed Course Electronic-Portfolio | ||||
| Group Participation and Blackboard use 10% | Group Contract is not Posted on Message Board | - Group Message Board is used effectively for communication | - Group Demonstrated use of Problem Solving Techniques | - Group Demonstrated effective sharing of resources |
| - Group did not post Group Meetings Minutes on BB group Message Board | - Group Minutes Posted Including members roles and what has transpired in meetings | - Group Demonstrated application of methods for Brainstorming- like c-map | - Group Demonstrated effective Sharing Innovative Ideas in blog format on Group Message Board | |
| - Group has only a few group files in the file exchange | - Group Meeting Minutes Include Satisfactory Details of Meetings | - Group Meetings Minutes Demonstrated Depth of Meetings | - Group Demonstrated effective assembly of written report from entire team on File Exchange | |
| Tests 1 and 2 | ||||
| Student Demonstrated poor preparation and scored poorly | Student Demonstrated poor preparation and scored Fairly | Student Demonstrated poor preparation and scored B in the Exams | Student Demonstrated poor preparation and scored A in the Exams | |
| Written Report 16% | - Report Was Poorly Organized | - Report Was Clear and Concise | - Report Presented a Strong Thesis for the Technical Problem | - Report Demonstrated Strong Community Service |
| - Report with Poor Structure | - Report was Organized | Report Presented Persuasive Arguments and Recognize Opposing Views | - Report Demonstrated Strong Technology base | |
| - Report with Spelling and Grammar Problems | - Report Showed Fair Applications of VE Concepts | Report Demonstrated Good Knowledge of VE Applications | - Report Demonstrated Strong Applications of VE Concepts | |
| - Report was Well Referenced | - Report Demonstrated Solid Research Base | - Report Demonstrated Relation between Technology/Community Service and Entrepreneurship | ||
| Oral Report 9% | - Poorly Organized Presentation | - Clear and Concise Presentation | Presentation of Good Solution to Technical Problems | Presentation of Comprehensive VE Plan |
| - Poor Transition Among Speakers | - Smooth Transition of Speakers | Presentation of Convincing Arguments | Presentation of VE Concepts Used | |
| - Poor Quality of Visual Materials | - Good Quality of Visuals | Demonstration of Interdisciplinary Knowledge Gained | Presentation of a VE Implementation | |
| - Smooth Transition of Visuals | Demonstration of a level of Innovation | Demonstration of relationships between Various Elements of the Project | ||