On your desk is a pile of CDs labeled "Expert Interviews." You decide to pop one into your computer. It is an engineer giving advice on ways to solve the problem. You think to yourself that this is going to be a piece of cake. But, then you listen to the environmental scientist and realize that his advice is quite different.

Below are synopses and images from the videos provided in Pollution Solution (the videos were too big to include on the web). Your job is to integrate these various perspectives into your final report.


Engineering Perspective

Dr. Al Ficksit from Buildit University is focused on the technical feasibility of the solution. He acknowledges that a lot of companies in the energy market are interested in alternative renewable energy sources like wind and solar energy, but he does not feel that at this time it would be an effective strategy for this company. He argues that coal is relatively inexpensive right now and thus provides a much more economic source of fuel for energy production. He recommends the use of pollution control technologies. For more information on these technologies, review the Technologies section of the Resources.

A Clean Coal Technology Called a Scrubber


Environmental Perspective

A Statue Depicting Environment Degradation

Dr. Don P. Lute from Earth Day University is interested in environmentally friendly solutions. He looks at whether the solution will be successful from a longer term perspective. He would like to see our energy systems transformed to ones that don’t rely so exclusively on fossil fuels. Fossil fuels not only pollute the environment today, but will eventually run out and no longer be available for our use. He wants to raise your awareness of the importance of developing a range of alternative technologies even as you try to solve the immediate problem today. For more information on these alternative energy technologies, review the Technologies section of the Resources. In addition, review the Environmental Science section for more information on the pollution problem.


Legal Perspective

Ms. Foll O. DeLaw, esq. from Inviro, Litt, & Gation LLP is focused on the legality of the solution. She would recommend first gaining an understanding of the Clean Air Act and the specific legal issue that this case involves. Then, she would find out what improvements were made at the facility. This information can be found in Energy One's Annual Report. The next step is to see how the courts have interpreted modernization or improvements under the statue of the Clean Air Act. You would do this by conducting a search in Lexus. Finally, she would compare whether the improvements made by the facility fall within the scope of the Clean Air Act. If the improvements were considered minor, then she would probably recommend litigating. If the improvements were more involved, she would recommend negotiating with the EPA and finding a technological solution that would comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.

A Screenshot of a Westlaw Search


Economic Perspective

Stock Market Prices Scrolling Along Buidling

Dr. Albow Monie from Cash University is interested in finding the most cost-effective solution for the company. He says that the goal of companies is to make money; otherwise, they can't stay in business and will be purchased by someone else on the stock market. He recommends that companies weigh the cost/benefits of any solution before deciding to pick that option. For more information on how to analyze the economics of a solution, see the Economics section of the Resources. He argues that it can be a mistake if companies are pushed to do the environmentally/socally responsible thing without considering the cost/benefits first.