show properties

Group 2

by Anthony Ruch

Assessment

Rubrics and Criteria

 

Maya Math and Architecture

Rubrics to Meet Course Objectives (Cumulative Blocks)

Performance

F-D

C

B

A

Course Elements 

Unsatisfactory Performance

Acceptable Performance 

Good Performance

Targeted Performance

Class Participation          15% - Student Missed four or more classes/Team meetings or  Combination -Student missed less than four Classes/Team Meetings or Combination -  Student  missed less than three Classes/Team Meetings or Combination  -  Student missed less than two Class/Team Meetings or Combination
- Student Failed to engage in sharing ideas with their team - Student  Demonstrated Participation in Case Study Report (Executive Summary) - Student  Demonstrated Participation in Case Study Presentation  - Student Demonstrated Effective Team Work as evidenced in BB 
- Student received negative feedback from all other team members - Student Participated in Class Exercises and in Quizzes - Student Students Participated in Class Discussion - Student received positive  feedback from all other team members 
    Student Completed Course Electronic-Portfolio  
Group Participation and Blackboard use               10% Group Contract is not Posted on Message Board - Group Message Board is used effectively for communication - Group Demonstrated  use of Problem Solving Techniques   - Group Demonstrated effective sharing of resources
- Group did not post Group Meetings Minutes on BB group Message Board - Group Minutes Posted Including members roles and what has transpired in meetings  - Group Demonstrated application of methods for Brainstorming- like c-map - Group Demonstrated effective Sharing Innovative Ideas in blog format on Group Message Board
- Group has only a few group files in the file exchange -  Group Meeting Minutes Include Satisfactory Details of Meetings - Group Meetings Minutes Demonstrated Depth of Meetings - Group Demonstrated effective assembly of written report from entire team on  File Exchange
       
Midterm Presentation          5%        
 - Student Demonstrated Poor preparation and lack of progress on overall PBL  - Student Demonstrated adequate preparation and sufficient progress on overall PBL  - Student Demonstrated good preparation and solid progress on overall PBL  - Student Demonstrated superior preparation and excellent progress on overall PBL
       
       
ePortfolio Presentation (Report)                         30% - Report Was Poorly Organized  - Report Was  Clear and Concise  - Report Presented a Strong Thesis for the Posed Problem - Report Presented a Strong Thesis for the Posed Problem and cited at least 2 leading experts in the field.
- Report with Poor Structure -  Report was Organized  - Report Presented Persuasive Arguments and Recognize Opposing Views - Report Demonstrated a Strong Understanding of the Maya's influence on today's world.
- Report with Spelling and Grammar Problems - Report with Strong Structures and No Grammar Problem Report Demonstrated Interdisciplinary Knowledge Gained - Report Demonstrated Strong Understanding of the Maya Culture
  - Report was Well Referenced  - Report Demonstrated Solid Research Base - Report Demonstrated Relation between the Maya and other Contemporary cultures
Oral Report                    10% - Poorly Organized Presentation - Clear and Concise Presentation  - Presentation of a Solid Thesis for the Posed Problem  - Presentation of  a Strong thesis backed by leading experts.
- Poor Transition Among Speakers - Smooth Transition of Speakers  - Presentation of Convincing Arguments   - Presentation of  All sides of the Argument and logical demonstration of why you chose your side.
- Poor Quality of Visual Materials - Good Quality of Visuals  - Demonstration of Interdisciplinary  Knowledge Gained - Report Demonstrated Strong Understanding of the Maya Culture
  - Smooth Transition of Visuals  - Demonstration of a level of  Innovation in Presentation  - Demonstration of relationships between Maya technology and advancement compared to contemporary civilizations.
Capstone Experience             30%  - Student did not participate in the Capstone Experience - Student participated in the Capstone Experience - Student participated in the Capstone Experience - Student participated in the Capstone Experience
   -  Students contributions to their experience in Chiapas were poorly communicated in the ePortfolio or not communcated at all.  -  Students contributions to their experience in Chiapas were communicated clearly in the ePortfolio.  -  Students relates his / her experiences in Chiapas with the PBL his / her group participated.  These relationships were communicated clearly in the ePortfolio.
     - Student posts pictures or other digital images to the ePortfolio.  - Student posts pictures or other digital images to the ePortfolio and provides comments on how the sites, culture and history impacted his / her learning experience.