For the second time in
two years, the nine Justices had to decide whether to enforce an
ICJ consular notice decision calling for a stay of execution.
In Breard, six justices had rejected the international
law claim by applying the procedural default and last in time rules.
In the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act Congress
had restricted federal habeas appeals; any conflict with the 1963
Vienna Convention would be resolved in favor of the more recent
statute. The majority
also found that the treaty left to state parties the procedural
rules for implementation, and that in Breard’s case evidence of
guilt was so overwhelming that failure to notify the consulate was
harmless error. The
court also applied the 11th Amendment provision barring
suits against state government to immunity for Virginia. Justices Bryer, Stevens, and Ginsburg
all dissented in Breard and would have granted a stay in order to
hear argument on the merits. [31]
The Court swiftly dispensed
with Germany v. U.S. in a
one paragraph, unsigned per curiam
opinion. Seven justices regarded Germany’s tardy petition as too late
for consideration and noted that the Constitution’s Article III
grant of original jurisdiction only applied in cases affecting Ambassadors,
other public Ministers and Consuls.
Five Justices also reasoned that the 11th Amendment
granted Arizona immunity from suit by a foreign government. Justices Bryer and Stevens dissented, and Justices Souter and
Ginsburg joined their objections to granting immunity under the
11th Amendment. [32]
Contents
|