REFERENCES

Articles 

Aceves, William J. “International Decision: Murphy v. Netherland” American Journal of International Law 92 (1998): 87-91.

Aceves, William J.  “The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: A Study of Rights, Wrongs, and Remedies.” Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 31 (1998): 257-324.

Bedjaoui, Mohammed. “The Reception by National Courts of Decisions of International Tribunals.” In International Law Decisions in National Courts, edited by Thomas M. Franck and Gregory H. Fox, 21-35.  New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1996.

Bianchi, Andrea. “Overcoming the Hurdle of State Immunity in the Domestic Enforcement of International Human Rights.” In Enforcing International Human Rights in Domestic Courts, edited by Benedetto Conforti and Francesco Francioni, 405-439.  Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.

Blackmun, Harry A. “The Supreme Court and the Law of Nations.” Yale Law Journal 104 (1994): 39-49.

Charter of the Organization of Supreme Courts of the Americas, 40 St. Louis L.J. 1131, 1996.

Fitzpatrick, Joan. “The Unreality of International Law in the United States and the LaGrand Case,” , 27 Yale Journal of International Law,  Summer, 2002  p. 427

Franck, Thomas M., and Gregory H. Fox. International Law Decisions in National Courts, New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1996.

 Franck, Thomas M., and Gregory H. Fox. “Introduction: Transnational Judicial Synergy.” In International Law Decisions in National Courts, edited by Thomas M. Franck and Gregory H. Fox, 1-11. New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1996.

Gisvold, Gregory D. “Strangers in a Strange Land: Assessing the Fate of Foreign Nationals Arrested in the United States by State and Local Authorities.” Minnesota Law Review 78 (1994): 771-803.

Helfer, Laurence R., and Anne-Marie Slaughter. “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication.” Yale Law Journal 107 (1997): 273-328.

Henkin, Louis BREARD: Provisional Measures, U.S. Treaty Obligations, and the States The American Journal International Law October, 1998 p. 679

Henry, Jehanne E., Comment, Overcoming Federalism in Internationalized Death Penalty Cases, 35 Tex. Int'l L.J. 459, 461 (2000)

Kadish, Mark J. “Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: A Search for the Right to Consul.” Michigan Journal of International Law 18 (1997): 565-612.

Lee, Luke T. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 10714 (1966).

Lien, Molly Warner The Cooperative and Integrative Models of International Judicial Comity: Two Illustrations Using Transnational Discovery and Breard Scenarios, 50 Cath. U. L. Rev. 591, 638, 646-47 (2001)

G.E. do Nascimento e Silva, The Vienna Conference on Consular Relations, 13 Int'l & Comp. L.Q. 1214, 1214 (1964).

Sandra Day O'Connor, Our Shrinking World: Why Lawyers Need International Awareness, Keynote Address to the Union Internationale des Advocates, Philadelphia, Pa. (Sept. 3, 1997)

Sandra Day O'Connor, Broadening our Horizons: Why American Judges and Lawyers Must Learn about Foreign Law, INT'L JUD. OBSERVER (Int'l Jud. Acad./ASIL), June 1997, at 2 (article adapted from speech given by Justice O'Connor at the 1997 spring meeting of the American College of Trial Lawyers).  www.fjc.gov/  www.fjc.gov/STAFEDJUAF/ijo/intobs.html

Ordonez, Sarita, and David Reilly. “Effect of the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice on National Courts.” In International Law Decisions in National Courts, edited by Thomas M. Franck and Gregory H. Fox, 335-371. New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1996.

Kevin Reed, Richard J. Wilson, and Joan Fitzpatrick, "Race, Criminal Justice and the Death Penalty," Whittier Law Review 15 (1994): pp. 400, 402-409.

Quigley, John. LaGrand: A Challenge to the U.S. Judiciary, 27 The Yale Journal of International Law,  Summer, 2002  p. 435

Shank, S. Adele, and John B. Quigley. “Foreigners on Texas’s Death Row and the Right of Access to a Consul.” St. Mary’s Law Journal 26 (1995): 719-753.

Shank, S. Adele, and John B. Quigley.  “Obligations to Foreigners Accused of Crime in the United States: A Failure of Enforcement.” Criminal Law Forum 9 (1999): 99-142.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “A Typology of Transjudicial Communication.” In International Law Decisions in National Courts, edited by Thomas M. Franck and Gregory H. Fox, 37-69. New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1996.

Springrose, Linda Jane. Note, Strangers in a Strange Land: The Rights of Non-Citizens Under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 14 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 185, 195

Tams, Christian.  27 The Yale Journal of International Law,  Summer, 2002

Kelly Trainer, Comment, The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in the United States Courts, 13 Transnat'l Law. 227, 231-234 (2000)

Vagts Detlev F. The United States and Its Treaties: Observance and Breach 95 The American Journal International Law April, 2001, 313

Weinman, Jennifer Lynne The Clash Between U.S. Criminal Procedure and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: An Analysis of the International Court of Justice Decision in the LaGrand Case 17 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 2002  857,

Wilson, Richard J. “Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Decides U.S. Death Penalty Case,” 1998 ACLU International Civil Liberties Report 26-27.

Michael C. Dorf, FindLaw Forum: When U.S. States Execute Citizens of Other Countries, CNN.com.LAWCENTER, (July 25, 2001) (explaining that litigation over the LaGrand Case and others highlights the conflicts between how the United States views the application of international law to domestic law and how other countries regard the same), available at http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/ 07/ columns/ fl.dorf.executions.0725/index.html

U.S. Cases

Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371 (1998)

Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 2465 (per curiam), cert. & stay denying by Breard v. Pruett, 134 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1998), aff’g by Breard v. Netherland, 949 F.Supp. 1255 (E.D. Va. 1996).

Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371, 1998 (per curiam), cert. & stay denying by

Republic of Paraguay v. Allen, 134 F.3d 622 (4th Cir. 1998), aff’g 949 F.Supp. 1269 (E.D. Va. 1996).

Committee of U.S. Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Reagan D.D.C. 1987 and 2 F.2d 929 D.C. Cir. 1988. 

Faulder v. Johnson, 81 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 995 (1996).

State v. LaGrand, (Walter) 153 Ariz. 21, 734 P.2d 563, 565-66 (Ariz. 1987).

State v. Karl LaGrand, 152 Ariz. 483, 733 P.2d 1066 (Ariz. 1987);  cert denied. 484 U.S. 872, (1987).

LaGrand v. Lewis, 883 F. Supp. 469 (D. Ariz. 1995), Lethal Injection

LaGrand v. Lewis, 883 F. Supp. 451 (D. Ariz. 1995), Main Appeal

LaGrand v. Stewart, 133 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S.Ct. 422 (1998).

Federal Republic of Germany v. United States, 526 U.S. 111, 111-12 (1999)

Murphy v. Netherland, 116 F.3d 97 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 26 (1997).

Ohio v. Loza, 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 4574 (Ohio Ct. App.).

Ohio v. Issa, 752 N.E.2d 904, 935 (Ohio 2001) cert. denied  April 1, 2002

Paraguay v. Allen, 949 F. Supp. 1269, 1271 (E.D. Va. 1996), aff'd, 134 F.3d 622 (4th Cir. 1998).

Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).

Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).

United Mexican States v. Woods, 126 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 2563.

Villafuerte v. Stewart, 142 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 1998).

International Cases

R v. Abbrederis, (1981) Australia, 36 A.L.R. 109,

Case Concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Paraguay v. United States of America), International Court of Justice (April 9, 1998) <http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/ipaus/ipausframe.htm>.

I.C.J., Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran (U.S.A. v. Iran) (memorial of U.S.A. at 174).

From United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (USA. v. Iran), I.C.J. Pleadings, at 174, and Memorial of the United States to the International Court of Justice in the Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights, El derecho a la informaci n sobre la asistencia consular en el marco de las garant as del debido proceso legal, Opini n consultiva OC-16/99/de 1 de Octubre de 1999, solicitada por los Estados Unidos Mexicanos [hereinafter Advisory Opinion].

LaGrand Case (F.R.G. v. U.S.), 2001 I.C.J. (June 27), available at http://www.icj-cij.org.

Memorial of the Federal Republic of Germany  (F.R.G. v. U.S.), I.C.J. Pleadings (Lagrand Case) 139 (March 27, 2000), available at http://www.icj-cij.org

Counter-Memorial of the United States of America (F.R.G. v. U.S.), I.C.J. Pleadings (Lagrand Case) 139 (March 27, 2000), available at http://www.icj-cij.org

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 I.C.J. 14 (June 27).

Roach and Pinkerton v. U.S., Case 9647, Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, 147, OEA/ser.L/V/II.71, doc. 9 rev. 1 (1986-87).

Soering v. United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights, 1989. 161 Eur.Ct. H.R. (ser.A), 11 E.H.R.R. 439.

The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of the Due Process of Law, Advisory Opinion OC-16/99, Inter-Am. C.H.R. (ser. A) No. 16 (1999), 141.

Written Observations of the United States of America, Request for Advisory Opinion OC-16 (on file at Inter- American Court of Human Rights) at 27.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Advisory Opinion OC-16/99 of October 1, 1999, The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of Due Process of Law, para. 122.

Treaties

Article 10, UN Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals Who Are Not Nationals of the Country in Which They Live (U.N.G.A. Res. 40/144, (1985)).

Article 6(3), UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (U.N.G.A. Res. 39/46, (1984)); Rule 38(1),

Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons Under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment (U.N.G.A. Res. 43/173 (1988));

Commission on Human Rights, The Question of the Death Penalty, ESC Res. 2000/65, UN ESCOR, UN Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2000/65 (2000);

Commission on Human Rights, The Question of the Death Penalty, ESC Res. 1999/61, UN Doc. E/CN.4/RES/1999/61 (1999).

Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, art. 36, 59 Stat. 1055

UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (ECOSOC Res. 663 (1957)); Principle 16(2),

U.N. Charter Article 94

Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 U.N.T.S. 261.

Statutes

Section 834 (c) of the California Penal Code.

Code of Federal Regulations, 28 C.F.R. §50.5(a) and 8 C.F.R. §236.1(e).

Az. R. Crim. P. 32.2 (West 2001) (mandating that a defendant is precluded from relief for any claim "that has been waived at trial, on appeal, or in any previous collateral proceeding.")

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2001) and 28 U.S.C. 2261 (2001)

Web Sites

Amnesty International On-line, “A Time For Action-Protecting the Consular Rights of Foreign Nationals Facing the Death Penalty,” AMR 51/106/2001, Aug. 22 2001 http://www.web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/recent/AMR511062001

American University data on foreign nationals.  http://www.wcl.american.edu/humright/deathpenalty/vccr.html

Angel Breard briefs and opinions http://www.mwbb.com/breard/breardbriefs.htm

Death Penalty Information Center http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/foreignnatl.html

Justices See Joint Issues with the EU, Washington Post , July 8, 1998, at A24.

Contents