Existential Commitment and the Cartesian Semantics of the Port Royal Logic

 

in Jean-Yves Beziau & Gilman Payette, eds., The Square of Opposition, A General Framework for Cognition

(Bern: Peter Lang, 2012), pp. 61-97.

 

 Abstract

 

This paper investigates the truth-conditions put forth in the Port Royal Logic for categorical propositions in terms of “extension”.  The new Cartesian semantics was motivated by the rejection of medieval logic’s causal theory of reference because of its commitment to the transmission of formal properties from material objects to the mind.  Arnauld and Nicole formulate a new referential theory of signification that retains large parts of the medieval semantics of mental language but adopts a dualist metaphysics committed to causal occasionalism.  The new account is founded on the use of objective being, a concept developed in medieval philosophy but rejected as problematic by major medieval logicians committed to Aristotelian semantics.  Considered as a term in mental language, the objective being of a subject – the idea’s comprehension – contains modes that describe the subject and these determine the possible objects outside the mind that the idea signifies.  Signification, a relation between mental terms and external things, in turn is used to define extension, which in the Cartesian context is a relation among ideas: the extension of a term, which is understood to be a mental “species”,   consists of its inferiors, namely those species-ideas that signify entities that instantiate the modes in the higher species’ comprehension.   Truth-conditions are then defined in terms of extension.  Objective being of a subject, as the object of consciousness, also correlates with the propositional knowledge that predicates its content modes of a subject.   This correlation is used to unpack the medieval notion of false idea – one with a descriptive content false of every actual being.  It is explained how the truth-conditions of the categorical propositions, which are stated in terms of extension,  and the analysis of false idea entail (contra the interpretation of Jean-Claude Pariente) that the terms of a true affirmative categorical carry existential import.