A popular activity in most college astronomy classes is to come up with a
mnemonic to remember the sequence. One of the first, which has stuck since the
middle of the last century is:
Recall, we already had a method to estimate temperature of a star by studying its
spectrum: Applying Wein's Law. The identification of atomic and molecular lines
in the star is an even more powerful estimate for stellar temperature.
Not necessarily. A very careful analysis, taking into account the physical
condition of the stars atmosphere, must be included, when determining the
composition of a star. If Iron lines are seen to be very weak in the spectrum
of a star, it
could be the temperature is not right for the formation of that line, OR that
the amount of iron in the star's atmosphere is low.
We know, for instance, that about 90% of all atoms in nearly all stars are
Hydrogen atoms. But clearly, that is not always the strongest lines
in a given star!
Helium holds on to its
electrons the strongest. Neutral metals, and even more so, molecules are easily ionized.
O stars exhibit ionized Helium lines because they are VERY HOT. M stars, which
have molecules in their atmosphere, are VERY COLD. O, B, A, F, G, K, M, is
a TEMPERATURE sequence:
What about COMPOSITION?
But, does this mean that HOT stars have no metals (atoms heavier than Hydrogen
and Helium)? Do COLD stars have no Helium??