I am a PhD candidate in Philosophy at the
University of Cincinnati, with interests in philosophy of cognitive science and philosophy of biology.
My research focuses on organism-environment interaction and coevolutionary dynamics. I am interested in how and why coupled systems, across
various spatial and temporal scales, arise and persist.
On the cognitive science side, I draw on resources from
the enactive approach to cognition
in answering these questions, and in biology, I do the
same from developmental systems theory and research in
evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo).
In my dissertation, I offer a theoretical framework
that aims to bridge the gap between these two fields in
order to provide a shared space in which questions about
organism-environment dynamics can be investigated.
Aside from these topics, I am interested in
environmental philosophy, public engagement with science,
philosophical questions about scientific practice, and early modern philosophy (especially theories of
perception).
Recent Work
Upcoming conference: Doing Science in a Pluralistic Society (26-28 March, University of Dayton, OH, USA)
In this coauthored work, we offer a framework
for assessing and constructing Participation in
Scientific Research (PPSR) projects that builds
on previous suggestions by investigating
divergence in values and goals between
researchers and participants.
Paper under review: Enactivism and Ecological Psychology
Enactivism and ecological psychology converge on the relevance of the environment in understanding perception and action. In this paper, my aim is to more closely specify the environment as an organism's cognitive domain,
in turn strengthening a joint appeal to both
enactivism and ecological psychology.
Upcoming conference: 8th Biennial Conference of the Society for Philosophy of Science in Practice (7-10 July, Michigan State University, MI, USA)
I suggest that the concept of reciprocal causation can have a valuable epistemological and methodological impact on both biology and cognitive science.
At the heart of a key debate in each field is a defining claim regarding causal directionality, and drawing attention to the claims made by each side reveals
similarities in underlying commitments that impact the conceptual architectures of both fields.
Paper in progress: conceptualizations of color in visual ecology
In this coauthored work, we propose a
theoretical model for the evolution of color
vision informed by contemporary visual ecology
and the philosophical literature on color. We
argue for a relationalist approach to color
vision as coevolving with color signals.