PROTEOMICS II



PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL GENOMICS


TERTIARY PROTEIN STRUCTURE

Primary repository for protein structures - Protein Data Bank (PDB)


                                     View 1    View 2    View 3


EXAMPLE:

Get a list of the lipocalins (odorant binding proteins) in PDB

i) by searching PDB

ii) by a BLAST search with Bovine Odorant Binding Protein (P07435) restricting the output to the PDB database

Get the crystal unit cell dimensions and 3-D structure of the Bovine Odorant Binding Protein 1PBO

Protein structures may also be accessed via Entrez Structure

Get a list of Odorant-binding proteins from Entrez Structure, and the alternate and related 3D domains of P07435

(Use "Links" links)

Using the Molecular Modelling Database (MMDB):

i) Find  the principal  domains of 1PBO and a multiple alignment to related domains

ii) View the 3-D structure using Cn3D (download required)

iii) View the 3-D overlapped structures of  1PBO with the related structures 1RLB and 1BSO

using VAST with Cn3D or Swiss-PDB Viewer

(Get Structure Neighbors from the main MMDB Structure Summary site)


CLASSIFICATION OF PROTEIN STRUCTURES

Protein structures are classified on the basis of folds - structural combinations of 2-D elements

DATABASES OF PROTEIN FOLDS

SCOP - a comprehensive description of protein structures and evolutionary relationships based on a hierarchical classification scheme

CATH - a hierarchical classification system describing all known protein domain structures

Proteins clustered at four levels: C(lass) - alpha, alpha and beta, or beta

                                                A(rchitecture) - describes domain shape

                                                T(opology) - describes fold families, and

                                                 H(omologous superfamily) - clusters proteins likely to share homology, have common ancestor

                                                

EXAMPLE

Find the domains of the  BOP, PDB id 1pbo, from CATH

Get its Architecture, Topology and Homologous superfamily members, and further information from PDBSum

DALI

Contains a numerical taxonomy of of all known structures in PDB

Includes FSSP database

EXAMPLE

What are the common structural characteristics of the members of the lipocalin family?

Protein 3-D Structure Prediction Methods
 

Stanford Computational Biology Course:

Lectures Nov 3  slides 25 - 43, and Nov 24, 1999 (Protein Folds and Protein Structure Superposition)

Fold recognition lecture and examples in Ph.D. course at Denmark Technical University

Prediction from Sequence - the CASP Competitions

    - the "Holy Grail" for the structural biology community.

    - subject of a biennial competition and meeting (CASP).  Proteins whose structures are likely to be
      solved by NMR or X-ray crystallography by the meeting are provided in advance to researchers, who
      are then challenged to predict 3-D structures by the meeting.

Description at the Protein Structure Prediction Center  

 Summary of CASP3:  Koehl, P. and Levitt, M. (1999) Nature Structural Biology 6 (2), 108-111.

               of CASP5:  PROTEINS: Supplement 6, 2003

Kryshtafovych A. et al. (2005) Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins. 2005 Sep 26; [Epub ahead of print]

CASP has now completed a decade of monitoring the state of the art in protein structure prediction.
The quality of structure models produced in the latest experiment, CASP6, has been compared with that in earlier CASPs.
Significant although modest progress has again been made in the fold recognition regime, and cumulatively,
progress in this area is impressive. Models of previously unknown folds again appear to have modestly improved,
and several mixed alpha/beta structures have been modeled in a topologically correct manner.
Progress remains hard to detect in high sequence identity comparative modeling, but server performance in this area has moved forward.
 Proteins 2005. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Categories of Structure Prediction:

1.  Comparative modelling using a known template structure

    Attempts to build a structural model on the basis of close sequence similarity (detectable by FASTA or PSI-BLAST) to a template protein of known structure.
Even possible for sequence similarity below 25% with use of multiple sequence alignments, alignment of actual and predicted secondary structures (PHD, using neural networks, most popular) and manual adjustments.
CASP3: best current methods can build a reasonable model when when sequence similarity is significant (chance of a false match < 0.01).

2.  Fold recognition

    - also known as threading or 3- dimensional profile matching

    - use structure to assess the compatibility of the target sequence with each member of a library of
      known protein folds e.g. SCOP.

    - in CASP3 17 targets could be predicted by this method even though none could have been recognized
      by the best sequence comparison methods such as FASTA or PSI-BLAST.

    - the easiest model in this category is as good as the most difficult model in the previous category

3.  Ab initio prediction

      -attempts to build a model for the target protein without using a specific templatestructure

approaches include:

(i) using secondary structure, using sequence fragments & various refining methods

(ii) minimizing a physical potential energy function using a simplified protein representation

(iii) using a simplified protein model with some predictions of turns from secondary structure

Overall conclusions & questions

(i) prediction problem still very difficult but area advancing

(ii) is it more important to model a few sequences very well or many fairly well?


4. Application of Genetic Algorithms

A limited set of predicted approximate 3D structures is constructed which meet a preassigned fitness function (e.g. Root Mean Square Deviation of atomic coordinates).  Conformational parameters (e.g. torsional angles between atomic bonds) of these structures are then changed to a small degree and the new set of structures assessed to determine if new structures have been generated that better meet the fitness function (i.e. have lower RMSD values in this case).  Inferior structures are rejected from the set and the procedure repeated a specified number of times.
 

VSNS course Chapter 5
 

5. Probable surface similarity comparison -

1.  Consurf: enables the identification of functionally important regions on the surface of a protein or domain, of known three-dimensional (3D) structure, based on the phylogenetic relations between its close sequence homologues. 

2.  Database of proteins with WD repeats, including search tool, links to other resources.

The WD-repeat proteins are found in all eukaryotes and are implicated in a wide variety of crucial functions. The solution of the three-dimensional structure of one WD-repeat protein and the assumption that the structure will be common to all members of this family has allowed subfamilies of WD-repeat proteins to be defined on the basis of probable surface similarity. Proteins that have very similar surfaces are likely to have common binding partners and similar functions.

References:

The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions. 
T.  Smith, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Volume 24, Issue  5, Pages  181 -  185

Thirty-plus functional families from a single motif.  Yu et al. Protein Sci. 2000 Dec; 9(12):2470-6.

RESOURCES

Fold Databases

SCOP

FSSP

PClass

3D-PSSM
 

On-line biological services for protein structure prediction

Protein fold recognition servers

    
   
  3D-PSSM 

     PSIPRED. including GenTHREADER at University College London

     PredictProtein server at EMBL

     UCLA-DOE protein fold recognition server

   

EXAMPLE:

Predict the fold structure of the protein of sequence below:

MTSSQFDCQYCTSSLIGKKYVLKDDNLYCISCYDRIFSNYCEQCKEPIESDSKDLCYKNRHWHEGCFRCN
KCHHSLVEKPFVAKDDRLLCTDCYSNECSSKCFHCKRTIMPGSRKMEFKGNYWHETCFVCEHCRQPIGTK
PLISKESGNYCVPCFEKEFAHYCNFCKKVITSGGITFRDQIWHKECFLCSGCRKELYEEAFMSKDDFPFC
LDCYNHLYAKKCAACTKPITGLRGAKFICFQDRQWHSECFNCGKCSVSLVGEGFLTHNMEILCRKCGSGA

DTDA

(PredictProtein gives the following result:)

Conf   Score  E-val  Epair  Esolv  AlnSc Alen DLen Tlen PDB_ID
==============================================================
HIGH   0.725  0.004  -121.4  -3.4  120.0  256  309  284 1dnrA0
HIGH   0.724  0.004  -242.9  -2.0  101.0  250  374  284 1dykA0
HIGH   0.709  0.006  -439.7  -1.9   72.0  254  350  284 1erjA0
HIGH   0.701  0.007  -352.8   0.4   70.0  267  390  284 1l0qA0
HIGH   0.691  0.008  -246.5   0.8  101.0  243 1023  284 1k32A0
HIGH   0.691  0.008  -363.1 -13.3   61.0  191  642  284 1avc00
HIGH   0.684  0.010  -188.1 -12.8   59.0  239  403  284 1pkfA0

http://bioinf2.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psiout/77aa548c66a57352.gen.html

What do the above methods suggest for the function of this protein?

Databases of protein models

ModBase - a database of three-dimensional protein models calculated by comparative modeling.

EXAMPLE

Find structural models of the protein of sequence given above.

Structural Alignment Tools

LOCK

3dSearch

DALI

Post translational modifications