Research Points to Rapid Planetary Formation Around Distant StarsBy JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
ASHVILLE,
May 26 — New telescope observations suggest that planets may form
around distant stars more rapidly than previously thought, and some of
these planetary systems could be far more extensive than the Sun's,
astronomers say. The research, reported here today at a meeting
of the American Astronomical Society, showed that many huge disks of
dust around young stars — leftovers of stellar formation out of which
planets coalesce — appeared to dissipate within three million years of
the star's formation. The likely
explanation, the researchers said, is that the dust has already
collected into the dense building blocks of Earth-like solid planets,
which would be undetectable with current telescopes. If that is
the case, the findings challenge the working hypothesis, based largely
on studies of Jupiter in the solar system, that it takes at least 10
million years for planets to develop out of these protoplanetary disks
of dust and gas. Such disks with enough mass to form planetary systems
are relatively common with newborn stars. "We will have to adjust
our theories to understand how planets can form this quickly," Dr.
Elizabeth Lada of the University of Florida said at a news conference.
Dr. Lada and Dr. Karl Haisch of the University of Michigan, both of whom
conducted the observations with radio telescopes, also concluded that
the gas in the disks probably dissipated on a time scale similar to the
dissipation of the dust, a finding that indicated that large gaseous
planets like Jupiter could be getting an equally rapid start.
Other astronomers said they found the research provocative and
potentially significant in one of the most active fields of astronomy:
the study of planet formation and comparative planetary systems. In the
last eight years, astronomers have detected more than 100 stars and
observed even more circumstellar disks where planets may be forming.
Commenting on the new findings, Dr. David Weintraub, an astronomer at
Vanderbilt University, said it was "conceivable that the planet-forming
process is well on the way" around three-million-year-old stars.
But it is also conceivable, Dr. Weintraub said, that all the dust has
simply gone away. Some was probably sucked up by the star itself, and
the rest could have been blown out into space by winds of stellar
particles. A Vanderbilt graduate student, Jeffrey S. Bary,
working with Dr. Weintraub, reported X-ray detections of molecular
hydrogen around young stars that could be further evidence of extremely
early planet formation. Molecular hydrogen is the main constituent of
protoplanetary disks. Its persistence around a star with no detectable
protoplanetary disk could mean that there had been one and that the
dust had now coalesced into planetary objects, Mr. Bary said. Dr.
Lada acknowledged that it was not possible with current technology to
confirm that any planets or growing seeds of planets actually exist
around the young stars that have lost their detectable disks.
Still, Dr. Stephen P. Maran, an astronomer who is a spokesman for the
astronomical society, said the observations of how short a time
protoplanetary disks persist provided "clues to enable you to develop a
better theory" for how new planets develop. The researchers led
by Dr. Lada and Dr. Haisch examined dozens of young stars in the
constellations Orion and Perseus, a region of prodigious star birth
about 1,000 light-years from Earth. They determined that the
number of massive protoplanetary disks decreased as the age of the
clusters of stars they studied increased. In one cluster of
three-million-year-old stars, there were few such disks; by the age of
five million years, almost none of the stars appeared to retain their
disks. In another discovery, a team of international astronomers
using infrared telescopes was surprised to find similar circumstellar
disks that were 10 to 100 times as large as the solar system or any
planet-forming disks previously studied. The team, led by Dr.
Richard Elston of the University of Florida and Dr. Lada, who are
married, calculated that each disk's diameter stretched thousands of
times the distance from Earth to the Sun. Dr. Elston said the
observations suggested that it might be possible for planets to form at
much greater distances from their stars than previously thought. This
could throw theorists in a spin, but it would be good news for
astronomers. "Planets are notoriously difficult to detect near
stars, which swamp their visible light," Dr. Elston said. "So if the
more distant reaches of the disk are conducive to planet formation,
they will be easier to find once astronomers start looking there."
|